Evolution Korea
Korean scientists aren't taking any risks when it comes to the debate over evolution. The Society for Textbook Revise (STR) has been battling to get the Archaeopteryx and horses removed from textbooks, saying they are typical icons of evolutionism.
Confucian practices that emphasize worldly success and high valuation of education, still dominate the country's culture. However, Korea is seeking an alternative model of development.
Origins

The development of Iron Age culture brought more sophisticated states such as Goguryeo Baekje and Silla to the Korean peninsula. They all developed a unique culture that merged with the influence of their powerful neighbors and they also adopted various aspects of Chinese culture, including Confucianism and Buddhism, although shamanism continued to be practiced.
Goguryeo, the first of the Korean kingdoms, was the first to establish their own system of government. It established a king centered system of government in the early 2nd century. It expanded its territory into Manchuria and the north of the Peninsula with an array of wars that drove the Han loyalists out of the region.
It was during this period that a regional confederation grew up called Buyeo. In the Samguk yusa of the 13th century Wang Geon's name was listed as king. Buyeo was then referred to as Goryeo and this is how the name Korea came to be. 에볼루션 was a great commercial state and also a place of learning. The people who lived there cultivated crops and raised livestock such as sheep and goats. They also made furs from them as well. They danced in masked dramas like tallori and sandaenori. They also held a festival every year in December called Yeonggo.
The economy of Goryeo was boosted by the brisk trade, which included the Song Dynasty of China. Traders from Central Asia, Arabia, Southeast Asia and Japan came to Byeongnando, the gateway to Gaeseong's capital city. Gaeseong. Silk and medicinal herbs were among the goods they brought.
Around 8,000 BCE The Koreans began to establish permanent settlements and cultivating cereal crops. They also created polished pottery, stone tools and began to organize themselves into clan societies. The Neolithic Age continued until the 12th century BC. At this time, Gija, a Shang dynasty prince from China is believed to have introduced high culture to Korea. Many Koreans believed, until the 20th century that Gija and Dangun gave Korea their people a basic culture.
Functions
Korea's traditional model of development, which was based on state-led capital accumulation and government intervention in business and industry as well as a rapid economic growth that took it from being one of the poorest nations in the world to the ranks of OECD nations in just three years. However, this model was filled with corruption and moral hazard and was unsustainable in a global economy of trade liberalization, liberalization and democratization.
The current crisis has revealed the flaws of the old model, and it is likely that a new model will emerge in its place. Chapters 3 and 4 explore the roots of Korea's government-business risk partnership and explain how the rise of business actors with an interest in maintaining the system impeded the country from implementing fundamental changes. By focusing on corporate governance and financial resource allocation the chapters provide a thorough analysis of the root causes of the crisis and provide suggestions to the best ways to move forward with reforms.
Chapter 5 examines the possibilities for Korea's post-crisis evolution of the development paradigm, exploring both the legacies of the past as well as the new trends brought about by the IT revolution. It also examines how these changes will affect Korea's social and political structures.
A major finding is that several emerging trends are changing the nature of power in Korea and it is these developments that will determine the direction of the future of the country. In spite of the fact that political participation in Korea is still very restricted new forms of democracy are emerging that override political parties and challenge them, thereby changing the system of democracy in Korea.
Another important finding is that the power and influence of the Korean elite has diminished. A large section of the society feels disconnected from the ruling class. This indicates the need for more civic education and participation and new models of power sharing. The chapter concludes that the success or failure of Korea's development paradigm will depend on how well these new ideas can be combined with a willingness to make hard choices.
Benefits
South Korea has the ninth largest economy in the world, and the sixth fastest-growing. It has a huge and growing middle class, and a robust research and development base that is driving innovation. The government has also recently increased its investments in infrastructure projects to boost economic growth as well as to promote social equity.
In 2008 the Lee Myung-bak administration announced five indicators of leadership in a bid to establish a new development system with a focus on improvements and practicality. It aimed to streamline government organization, privatize public companies with more efficiency, and also reform administrative regulations.
Since the end of Cold War, South Korea is pursuing a strategy for integration of its economy with the rest and beyond the region. Exports of high-tech consumer electronics and advanced manufacturing techniques have become a major source of income. In addition the government has been promoting the Saemaeul Undong (New Community Movement) initiative, transforming the country from an agricultural one to one that is that is focused on manufacturing.
The country also has an excellent standard of living, and provides various benefits to employees, including pregnancy leave and job security. Additionally, employers are required to sign up to accident insurance which covers costs associated with work-related illness or injury. It is also typical for businesses to provide private medical insurance to protect against illnesses that are not covered by National Health Insurance.
As a result, South Korea has been thought of as a model for success for many developing countries around the world. However the global financial crisis that hit Asia in 1997 challenged this notion. The crisis shattering the conventional wisdom about Asia's miraculous economies and resulted in a radical rethinking of the role of the state in regulating the risky activities of private business.
In the wake of this shift, it seems that Korea's future isn't clear. A new generation of leaders have taken on the image of a "strong leader" and are beginning to experiment with market-oriented policies. A powerful domestic power base makes it difficult to implement any major change.
Disadvantages
The reemergence and influence of creationists is a major hurdle for Korean science in its efforts to educate the public on evolution. The majority of Koreans are in favor of teaching evolution to students however, a small section led by Bun-Sam Lim (the head of the Society for Textbook Revise, STR) is pushing for its removal from textbooks. STR argues that teaching evolution encourages "atheist materialism" and portrays an "unhopeful" worldview for students, which could cause students to lose faith in humanity.
The reasons behind anti-evolutionary beliefs are complex and varied. Some researchers suggest that it is due to religious belief, while others point to an increasing prevalence of anti-intellectualism, which has been exacerbated by growing political elite fragmentation along ideologies, regions, class, and gender. The one-sided populism that is backed by powerful conservative think groups, business interests, and other influential groups has also contributed to the public's distrust of the scientific community.
Ultimately, the widespread weaknesses discovered in this study point to the urgent need for targeted policy interventions that can mitigate them. As Seoul continues to work towards becoming a cohesive urban landscape, these insights provide a basis for a unified push for greater inclusivity in its policies.
In the COVID-19 case, identifying the vulnerable neighborhoods and the occupants will be crucial to drafting precise, compassionate policies to improve their lives and security. The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on Jjokbangs, for example is a reflection of the socio-economic differences that can increase vulnerability to both natural and man-made disasters.
To overcome this, South Korea needs a more inclusive civil society that can bring all communities together to address the most pressing issues facing the city. This requires a fundamental shift in the structure and power of institutional politics. The Blue House is able to mobilize a vast bureaucracy and strategically leverage the Supreme Prosecutor's Office and intelligence bureau, which are not subject to oversight by parliamentary bodies or independent inspection agencies. This gives the president enormous power to force his or her own vision on the rest of the country. This is a recipe that can result in polarization and stagnation of the country.